If Roland Emmerich is your movie God, pray not to be marginal or ordinary. Joe the plumber and his ilk are the first to suffer several million terrible deaths in this inexcusable waste of money. The end of earth as a world and culture unifying event? Only in Roland’s mind. If you aren’t a cog in his story-telling machine, you are as good as dead.
With “2012,” Roland “Independence Day” Emmerich has made the most violent film of all time. For almost three hours, the end of human civilization is arbitrarily and graphically depicted. There are no bloody deaths, such realism has no place in a film made by a man who alleged in his previous movie that mammoths, humans, pyramids, and ships all existed at the same time twelve thousand years ago. There is the motif of people being hit with tidal waves and looking peacefully at the camera right before their watery deaths (as was the case more than FIVE times in this stupid movie) continuing. The acceptance of a terrible death by these characters, many of who are major, is an extremely annoying occurrence. This goes back to Emmerich’s God complex: characters die this supposed “merciful” death if Emmerich considers them important, if not, a horrific death awaits. Major characters are ground up in gears and shown graphically and pointlessly drowning.
Emmerich’s latest begins during 2009, when scientists discover that the tectonic plates that make up the earth’s crust (I think) are shifting and behaving erratically, forecasting disaster for humanity everywhere in a few short years. The governments of the world keep this a secret, hoping to use the projected time wisely to prepare for humanity’s survival. However, it soon becomes apparent that even the best predictions are inaccurate, and that humankind is generally screwed. Before a single effects-driven event, we also learn that the wealthy private sector was given the right to buy space on massive “arks,” which are later revealed to be foolish-looking cruise ship-submarine hybrids.
The film follows several characters. There is the main scientist/White House staff member played by Chiwetel Ejiofor, who is morally conflicted from the beginning about his government’s action yet does nothing really to prevent anything or warn anyone, except his cruise-ship performer father. Danny Glover plays the president of the United States, and Thandie Newton plays his daughter. There is John Cusack as Jackson Curtis, a limo driver/science-fiction author, and Amanda Peet as his ex-wife. The film uses Mr. Cusack’s character as the one the audience is supposed to follow and identify with the most, similar to numerous Emmerich hero-fathers of past films. The main problem with “2012”’s characters are that they are not in fact characters. Everyone in this film is a cog in a machine, with Emmerich’s God-complex soaring to new heights as he plays evil puppet master, sparing people and condemning them with the most arbitrary nature. No character has anything resembling a personality, and the excuse that this is an effects-driven action film is no excuse, even Emmerich’s own past films had great characters without sacrificing the spectacle.
As the film moves on, so to do its characters, trotting the globe most inexplicably given the fact that fuel and resources are now mostly underwater. When our heroes, lead by Jackson Curtis, arrive in China or wherever the arks are being launched from, the passengers and potential survivors of the events of 2012 are revealed to be, not surprisingly, a very homogenous bunch, with the future looking mighty like something Adolph Hitler would’ve imagined. This should be the final insult of the film, but there are still thirty long minutes to go. With its oppressive run-time, shoulder-shrugging approach to the death of millions, and ridiculous happy-and-ambiguous-at-the-same-time ending, “2012” has managed to do the impossible and unseat “Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen” as the worst film of 2009.
Film Grade: F